Think that soft bounces are caused by a full inbox? Then think again!

Think that soft bounces are caused by a full inbox? Then think again!

Dela Quist
Alchemy Worx

Most email marketers do not view soft bounces as being a major cause
for concern, so rarely, if ever, have any specific strategies been in
place for dealing with them. Soft bounces are a very strong indication
that one or more ISPs were concerned enough about the reputation of the
IP address you are using,  your mailing volumes or the level of SPAM
complaints you are generating to temporarily block your campaign.

Over
the last two years our agency has begun to take soft bounces very
seriously indeed. Compared with soft bounces, hard bounces are
relatively straight forward – there are far fewer reasons for their
occurrence and only one way of dealing with them, which is to remove
them from your list.

The reason so many people
don’t treat soft bounces seriously enough seems to be because most
definitions of a soft bounce are outdated.  

Here are but two typical examples of the definition of a soft bounce taken from well respected sources:

  • A
    soft bounce just means the recipient's email account was 'temporarily
    unavailable'. Maybe their server was busy, or the recipient was away on
    vacation, or their account was too full.

  • A
    soft bounce occurs when the recipient's mail server replies with an
    error other than 5xx, or never replies at all. An example of a soft
    bounce error could be caused by a server that overloaded or a user
    whose mailbox is full.

Most
current definitions of a soft bounce do not really convey any sense of
urgency or importance, worst of all they seem to indicate that the
bounce had nothing to do with your mail marketing practice at all.
After all what can you do to stop someone’s server crashing or being
taken down for maintenance or a subscriber’s mailbox filling up while
they are on holiday?

Some ESPs set the default for
removing soft bounces at 10 or more and best practice guidelines
typically suggest removal after 3 subsequent bounces, further reducing
the sense of urgency.

General definitions of a soft bounce and guidelines for dealing with them haven’t changed for at least five years!

In
this time inbox sizes have dramatically increased so 'mailbox full'
messages are highly unlikely to occur; Gmail currently offer 7GB of
storage! I don’t know anyone who has exceeded their Gmail or for that
matter Yahoo or Hotmail storage limit and even if there are such
people, they are hardly representative of the average consumer. Even if
you have a large number of people using their work email address, how
many companies start bouncing potentially valuable communications
without letting the user know that their inbox is due a spring clean.

I
also suspect that bounces caused by overloaded ISPs (Hotmail etc.) or
corporate servers are not as common as the definitions quoted above
would seem to indicate.

This means that the most likely cause of soft bounces is ISP blocking.

The
way ISPs deal with spam has become much more aggressive and incredibly
sophisticated. For a start they are very quick to start blocking emails
when they identify suspicious patterns of behaviour from a given
sender, IP address or range.

Typical causes of
blocking are: lack of authentication or accreditation; poor or unproven
IP reputation; fluctuations in the volume of messages sent from the IP
address you are using and spam complaints attributed to your IP
address. It's important to bear in mind that you may incur soft bounces because of the behaviour of companies sharing your IP address, making the way your ESP handles its shared IP addresses very important.

Emails blocked in this way are recorded as soft bounces, so your soft
bounces are important indicators of how 'Spammy' ISP’s think you are at
a given point in time. They
are an indication of a drop in reputation for the IP address you are
using, uneven mailing patterns and/or an increase in the level of SPAM
complaints your email is generating.  All of these things are things that you and your ESP can do something about!

The purest definition of a soft bounce is 'A delivery failure with a 4XX/Transient bounce code' examples of which are:

  • 421 Grey listing = Re-try now and send again

  • 451 no reverse DNS = Re-try now and send again later after you fix your DNS

Soft bounces should be regularly investigated because we believe that they are more likely to be caused by temporary ISP blocking than temporary problems related to individual subscribers.

I
would strongly recommend that anyone wanting to get a better
understanding of where soft bounces fit in the overall scheme of
deliverability should read the excellent 4 part series of articles on 'How Email Works' by Dennis Dayman of Eloqua

-Dennis
Eloqua

Don't Just Send, Deliver!

Last 5 posts by Dennis Dayman

Tags:

Comments Closed

to “Think that soft bounces are caused by a full inbox? Then think again!”

  1. Kelly Lorenz
    February 23, 2009 at 3:10 pm #

    Dennis,

    You make some very valid points in this post. My question to you is how much of this issue with ISPs blocking your message is resolved by re-sending the message at a later time? What I've heard often is that ISPs have determined that if a sender performs a one-and-done and are soft bounced, they are a spammer, but if they keep trying to re-send the message for up to a certain amount of time after the original send, they often get to the inbox. What are your thoughts on this?

    -Kelly Lorenz

  2. Rob
    February 24, 2009 at 10:14 am #

    Dennis,

    You make some good points however the Gmail analogy probably isn't a good one. 7Gig for Gmail is far beyond what most companies give their employees. In the B2B market, full mailboxes are fairly common.

  3. Miriam
    February 25, 2009 at 3:19 am #

    I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    Miriam

    http://www.craigslistguide.info

  4. Sarah
    February 25, 2009 at 3:21 am #

    I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    Sarah

    http://www.craigslistdecoded.info

  5. Lem
    February 27, 2009 at 2:39 pm #

    Good points about soft bounces…

  6. Lem
    February 27, 2009 at 2:41 pm #

    As an email marketer… i believe soft bounces can triggered one IP to be block listed by ISP…

    That is the real fact that i believe!

  7. generic cialis soft
    February 9, 2010 at 2:58 am #

    You make some good points however the Gmail analogy probably isn't a good one.

Best Hosting For WordPress