Contributors

« July 2009 | Main | September 2009 »

8 posts from August 2009

August 26, 2009

By Chris Wheeler


ATT Random Bulking Problems

Received the following note from Pivotal Veracity support alerting folks to an existing problem at Yahoo! who's handling inbound mail for the ATT family of domains:
  • att.net
  • wireless.att.com
  • sbcglobal.com
  • bellsouth.net
Dear Clients,

Last week Pivotal Veracity personnel noticed a large portion of client’s email campaigns, bound for AT&T, landing in the spam folder & inbox simultaneously. In case you were not aware, AT&T’s back end is being serviced by Yahoo!.

PV Personnel reached out to Yahoo to determine if there was a global issue. According to Yahoo!'s postmaster team there are servers that are not up to date with the rest of Yahoo’s infrastructure. The Postmaster team is working on the problem and hopes to have it resolved by the end of the week or at the latest early next week.

Implications Clients should potentially expect to see a portion of their email, for AT&T, land in the spam folder because of the out of date filtering rules on those mail servers. Normal email delivery will be restored once the filtering rules are updated on those servers.

If you have any questions about delivery to AT&T or Yahoo! please don't hesitate to contact our support team here.

Sincerely, -The pvIQ Support Team


Also blogged about it over at the Bronto blog.

Chris Wheeler
Director of Deliverability, Bronto Software
Repost from my article at the EEC blog:

In what we believe to be the first collection of bounce codes in one public location, the Get Satisfaction site is now the official home to the eec’s Deliverability Roundtable bounce string project.  It is the culmination of many months worth of effort from industry veterans with experience in email deliverability and the technical aspects of sending and receiving email.  We decided to place it here since the site allows for dynamic updates as codes change in time and also provides a forum in which users can discuss deliverability issues and receive insight from folks in the industry. 

Why is this useful?
The most common form of communication for an ISP to communicate with a sender on a one-to-one ratio is a bounce message.  If an email is successfully handed off to an ISP, a success bounce is issued (250 ok).  However, if the message is not successfully handed off, an ISP will usually put pertinent information into a bounce message letting you know what the issue is and, in an ideal setting, what you need to do to avoid that bounce in the future.  The more failure bounces you collect, the less mail is getting through to your recipients.  If you’re concerned about the highest level of delivery penetration, you’ll review the bounce codes to spot trending and actionable items you can do to get your mail through to an ISP.  That’s where this site comes into play.  We’ve amassed a list of the following ISPs that have standard bounce codes you should be aware of.  If you see a bounce from one of them, you should check the Get Satisfaction site to see if more information is available. 

  • Hotmail/Live
  • Comcast
  • ATT/BellSouth/SBC
  • Yahoo
  • AOL

Who should use it?
Anyone who has a responsibility around message delivery, most likely your IT or development team, will want to take a look at this.  Bounce messages are collected at the email server level so, unless your email application allows easy access to data in a useable format, you’ll need to have someone review the bounce messages at the server level to see the actual ISP message. 

How do I use it?
Let’s say you send out a mailing today.  After watching the initial delivery numbers, you see that Yahoo has taken a dip in delivery (meaning there’s a delta between the delivery numbers you’re seeing and what you usually expect).  Either by using the ESP’s delivery tools or by having someone on your team provide the information, you discover there’s an accumulation of the following bounce strings queuing up on your outbound email server. 

“451 Resources temporarily not available - Please try again later [#4.16.5]” 

You then go to the new bounce site and search for this string.  You should find the following match: 

“What does bounce code 451 Resources temporarily not available - Please try again later [#4.16.5] from Yahoo mean?” (check it out). 

After you click on the link, you see that this is a bounce message Yahoo! will serve up if their servers are over capacity and are pushing back on mail to allow them to catch up.  This is not a sender related bounce but rather a Yahoo! infrastructure one – all you can do is retry the message later and hope Yahoo! has some available cycles at that time (which you should be doing on most soft bounces anyway). 

See?  It’s that easy.  And in most cases there’s a link to the ISP’s postmaster page which will provide further information on what to do or context around why you’re receiving this bounce. 

How can you help?
There is no uniform standard amongst ISPs mandating that certain bounces be stated a certain way.  As such, you see a huge variety of bounce messages and what information an ISP will provide.  Also, as ISPs deem necessary, bounce codes change over time making existing ones outdated and adding new ones.  Please help the email community stay on top of the changes by contributing to the GetSatisfaction bounce project site when you see new bounce codes that aren’t listed or know one that’s already listed has changed.  By making this an industry effort, we can ensure all of us are up with the latest news.  Feel free to ask questions on the site as well.  We have a few deliverability folks monitoring it.

Who put this together?
The following folks were involved with this project and we extend our gratitude!

  • Joshua Baer - Founder & CEO - OtherInbox/Chief Evangelist - Datran Media
  • Dennis Dayman, VP, Privacy, Eloqua
  • Michelle Eichner, VP, Pivotal Veracity and Co-Chair, Deliverability Roundtable
  • Stephanie Miller - VP, Global Market Development - Return Path
  • Jack Sinclair - Co-Founder, COO & CFO - Return Path and Co-Chair, Deliverability Roundtable
  • Chris Wheeler - Director of Deliverability - Bronto Software
  • and other members of the eec Deliverability Roundtable

Chris Wheeler
Director of Deliverability, Bronto Software

August 12, 2009

By Andrew Kordek


Email Marketing Manager Title Has To Go

The title of email marketing manager is obsolete in my book. To me the word marketing is a word which reeks with the act of engaging in a monologue with the customer. Wikipedia defines marketing from the AMA as "the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large" The definition goes on to say that Marketing practice tends to be seen as a creative industry, which includes advertisingdistribution and selling.

Email marketing is not just about advertising or selling. Its about creating a dialogue  or engagement of the customer with your brand through the use of email. Its not about advertising to them via a monologue of you just shouting (err...blasting as some may say) at the customer with the latest deal. Email marketing does not stop at the promotional email. Its only the beginning of a journey across an entire customer lifecycle of getting them engaged and creating what would easily be a dialogue with your company.

Therefore I would like to suggest that anyone that is currently employed as an email marketing manager, that you petition your current employer for a title change to either an Email Dialogue Manager or an Email Engagement Manager. I think once you are called what you should be doing, some of you will start to act and execute more on what we SHOULD be doing.

August 11, 2009

By Loren McDonald


Respect Subscribers by Managing Expectations

Respect for subscribers is often absent from many email marketers' programs, as Andrew Kordek pointed out in a recent post “Respect in email.”

I concur that respect is important, but it's not enough to command that marketers respect their subscribers. Respect begins when you manage expectations at the start of the subscriber relationship.

Managing expectations means adopting a "no-surprises" policy. This means you make it clear up front how the opt-in process works. State what kind of content they signed up for and how often you'll send it. Put as much control as you can into your subscribers' hands.

Then, honor the expectations with the emails that you send. The mismatch – accidental or deliberate – between what a subscriber expects and what you actually send is what drives spam complaints, unsubscribes and disengagement.

Common Expectations

While we are all different, the following are typical things your subscribers expect from your brand and email program and where they have likely been disappointed before:

1. Privacy/Permission: You won't share their email addresses or data with other companies unless you state that up front and get their express permission to do so.

2. Brand: Your brand will be visible immediately in the inbox so subscribers can recognize it. They don’t want to have to guess what that acronym means or creative name you’ve come up for your newsletter.

3. Other communications: Unless they agreed to let you share their name with third parties or other groups within your company, they don't expect to receive email from them.

4. Content: If they signed up for a best practices/trends newsletter, they don't expect to get aggressive sales-oriented messages and could mark those as spam.

5. Frequency: Subscribers to an email called "The Weekly Digest" do not expect to suddenly start receiving the "Daily Deals" email from you. Of if you send 3-4 times during the year but then double or triple that frequency during the holidays, you will likely pay dearly in unsubscribes and spam complaints.

6. Format: Today, most people expect to receive an HTML email (even if they don't know what that means), though some prefer text for their mobile phone or other reasons. They will also expect that you give them the choice of formats or let them know the format if you don't offer options.

7. Subscription management: Savvy email consumers expect to subscribe, unsubscribe, change addresses or preferences, contact company reps or offer feedback without searching your Web site. Put all this information in an administrative area (typically in the footer) in each email.

8. Relevance and personalization: Most people are willing to share a certain amount of personal information with you, if they trust you won't abuse it and they believe they will receive value in return.

Explain why you ask for sensitive information such as a birth date, postal address or household income. If you ask for birth date, for example, I expect either a birthday email or that the emails I receive will be personalized based on my age range. (The exception being if you ask for legal reasons: alcohol, firearms, etc.)

My posting of this is not to embarrass Campaign Monitor, but to notify users of Campaign Monitor that you should be vigilant about your lists and reputation if you use the service. It is possible that either

  1. You email list have been compromised
  2. Your reputation might be effected if spam was sent as from you by the hackers using your account.
Per the site, the hacker imported their own lists, and managed to send spam to those lists and in some cases the lists already in the account.

A lock down of the services has been instituted at this time to prevent other unauthorized accesses.
 
Please contact your account managers at Campaign Monitor if you have questions, but they have already contacted all account owners

Full details can be found here:

We feel for the staff at Campaign Monitor during this time and hope they can quickly find resolution to this issue.

-Dennis

Don't Just Send, Deliver!


So, I need to apologize for the lateness of this post in the series, but with the kids on summer break and us taking a holiday it made it difficult to concentrate a bit it seems.

A few week ago my wife walked into my home office and said "Hook, line, and sinker" to which I responded "what?!" She again said, "they got me Hook, line, and sinker".

When asked further, she began to expound what she meant by describing a marketing email she received from Provo Craft that did not have a video within in the email, but a link to a set of video's over time, sort of a series that we had to wait for and boy did we wait for each and every one when it was released. The funny thing about this marketing campaign is that in only two (2) emails over a single month they have captured our attention without flooding us.

Of course, I asked her to write up her feelings about this one and what caused her to stay engaged for you to see.

------

Hey, hon -

I forwarded an email to you, and I'm sure you're wondering why.  It's not some sort of ploy to get you to add a little goodie to my Christmas list.  (Not yet, at least.)  I wanted to show you a marketing email that impressed me!

Picture 1


Okay, so you love to tell me that I would buy anything that is one-to-a-customer.  While I stand by the fact that that's not entirely true (I know I love a good clearance rack!), I will admit that this email pulled me in the other day.  The level of creativity and the relevance to my interests was enough to break down my "anti-marketing email" walls.  Get this - not only did I read through the email in it's entirety, but then I clicked over to their website, and then (the icing on the cake!), I WATCHED A MARKETING VIDEO.  It was a quick YouTube video, and it was witty.   They had an entire website set up to go along with this marketing idea, complete with a blog and twitter updates.  They certainly made the most of social media, while keeping it light-hearted and fun. 

An aside:  Kudos to you, Provo Craft.  It's been a long time since I've been entertained by a marketing pitch, but your "Gypsy" updates have been so catchy.  You've done exactly what I would guess you intended to do - peak my interest in a new product that has yet to be released.  I'll be anxiously awaiting the arrival of the "Gypsy" in my local scrapbook store so I can see all that it's capable of!

Sorry I got off-track, babe.  Just thought you'd like to see an email that I was impressed with, given it seems I'm usually dumping on marketing emails.  I like to give credit and praise where it's due, and in this case, from my mom-perspective, it was well-deserved.  Glad to have the opportunity...

Love you - wife

PS - An after-thought:  I like that Provo Craft made use of all of the new social medias available, but didn't overwhelm me with emails.  Thus far, over the course of a month, I've only received two emails in my inbox - one when they first got started, and one update.  A nice balance - they let me keep up-to-date with their "progress" if I chose to, but didn't decide for me that I would want to see every bit of the process.  Again, so impressed!

------

My wife was right, after she sent me this I went to review their site and was impressed that Provo Craft DID really use a great set and balance of social media avenue's to allow customers to monitor the progress of these video's and other announcements of their new product release vs. just all email, all the time.

You want a good laugh as well, check out their "Dog the Bounty Hunter" style video's at http://www.roguegypsies.com/ I'm not a scrap-booker, but they kept me engaged.

Kudo's to Provo Craft for winning over my wife and breaking my bank again ;). This is award winning marketing in my book (checkbook that is)

-Dennis

Don't Just Send, Deliver!

August 04, 2009

By DJ Waldow


This is NOT spam

Bank of America - This is NOT spam header

Or is it? I recently blogged about how Bank of America used valuable real estate to tell their readers that the email is NOT spam.

Read the full eec post

Below I've copied a section of the post that is most relevant to this blog. I've also added a few deliverabilty-related thoughts to consider.

---------------

Why This Technique May Work

Hey, you've gotta give credit for Bank of America for not giving up on email marketing as a engagment channel. While I may have historically marked this as spam out of habit, I didn't this time. Was it because of the timing of their email (I just secured a B of A Mortgage)? Was it because they told me the email was NOT spam? Who knows.

I wonder what their open vs. unsubscribe/spam ratios looked like for this campaign. Did they do some A|B testing on that big red box telling me "This is NOT spam"? Maybe that phrase works for some, maybe for the majority. So, Bank of America - did this work?

Why This Technique May Fail

Telling me something is NOT spam makes me think even more that it IS spam. That's what spammers and phishers do. "Please trust us. We're the good guys, the guys with the white hats." Yeah, right. I trust you. Also, if you have to tell me something is NOT something I think it may be, well...you're already starting behind. As mentioned above, that preheader / above-the-fold area is what usually is seen first. Bank of America wants me to complete the survey, but I may be caught up on the fact that this email is or is NOT spam.

---------------

As we know with deliverability, there are many factors that determine whether or not your email will get delivered (inbox or otherwise). A few thoughts/questions to ponder:

1. Did this strategy by Bank of America result in fewer complaints, hence improving delieverability overall? Or, is the reputation of their IPs already damaged?

2. Will this be the trend adopted by other financial institutions? Other email marketers?

3. Will blacklists and ISPs "go easier" (read: less weight on complaints) on companies sending legitimate email that utilizes this approach?

What do you think?

DJ Waldow
Director of Community at Blue Sky Factory

August 04, 2009

By Stephanie Miller


What Will It Take To Get You to Authenticate

Authentication has a problem:  While it's a good thing, it's not an urgent thing for email marketers. 

It has a small impact on an individual marketer's deliverability, but in aggregate, it's one of the things that marketers can do to truly help ISPs and the receiver community fight spam and reduce messaging abuse.

As my colleague J.D. Falk, who is a recognized messaging abuse expert, wrote in the Return Path blog this week, "Yet in the background, seemingly far from anything that makes end users excited, email is slowly becoming more secure as authentication -- primarily DKIM -- grows."

J.D. cites a number of cool new features from Gmail in particular that are based on DKIM authentication. Like the key icon feature for PayPal and the new one-click unsubscribe option. Those "shiny new benefits" (as he calls them) may be the incentive that marketers need to stop waiting and start authenticating across all email message types.

What is your status on authentication?  Still procrastinating?  What do you need to see in terms of benefits in order to participate in this important industry movement?

Please comment below or on J.D.'s post the Return Path blog - and I'll follow up here to share any insights.

Ad Space

  • OtherInbox - put your email on autopilot
  • Eloqua
  • Return Path
  • Port25 Advanced Email Software for ESPs and Enterprises - Evaluate Now!

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed